Every U.S. Congress person who votes for socialized healthcare is putting the freedom and the lives of the American people, especially the elderly, unborn babies, and terminally ill person's lives at risk based on cost vs. profit.  And, small businesses,and taxpayers will be  at risk of being controlled by government.  The government/HMO private corporations will tell U.S. citizens who can live and who will die.  They will tell us who can have medical treatment or pain relief treatments, x-rays, wheel chairs, or  ambulances.  They will tell us who will remain on life support and who will have the plug pulled.  They will tell us if we can or cannot have Rx medications.  In fact, it is my opinion that the HMO's which were introduced in the 90s will be the catalyst that promotes and creates the programs for-profit.  Doctors will be told what they can or cannot do for patients and they will be paid very little for their services as they will also be controlled.  If you think it's difficult now to pay for an ambulance or a wheel chair just wait until you're denied both medical aids because it costs the corporate HMOs run by the government too much money.  It's interesting that a U.S. President who has only been in office for a few months has decided that the U.S. should be impacted with excessive debt and taxation that could destroy our economy since millions are out of work. For example, after the HMO program was introduced back in the 90s, they refused me treatment and refused to pay for nearly everything including x-rays after someone hit my car even though I had insurance.  The corporate HMO owners didn't care what my doctor said because their bottom line was costs vs. profit.  People will suffer the consequences of the for-profit decisions decided by government administrators vs. doctors.  And, that folks, will be the exact same situation for Americans  if they are faced with socialized healthcare programs, except Americans will  probably stand in long lines for hours and wait one year for surgery if the government/HMOs approve it depending upon their variants of who shall or shall not be approved.

 

     Also, the American people should propose a law demanding that every member of Congress report if they own stocks in any of the pharmaceutical or alleged HMO corporations and which corporations contributed to their campaign funds.  For example,  AIG  allegedly contributed to many politicans including President Obama and were not punished for their role in the economic crisis.  In fact, AIG allegedly received funding from Sharia law according to news article.

 

     The fact that Obama wants our medical history on-line which is supposedly confidential is ridiculous.  Everyone knows computer information can be hacked and exposed just like social security numbers and credit card numbers are hacked into by the expert criminals.  And, why should the government have or want access to our medical records?  Has anyone asked President Obama and the U.S. Congress why they want access to the medical records of the American people?  Is nothing left sacred or will there be any privacy laws that aren't violated by the government as they trample on the constitutional right that guarantees the right of privacy?  For 230 years, the government hasn't been able to access our medical records.  And, the American people refused socialized healthcare when Hillary Clinton attempted to push it forward.  Don't they care that their kids and grandkids will be facing the effects of their decisions? I think President Obama and his family and V.P. Biden, Congress, and the Senate should be the first people in the U.S. to publish their medical records on the confidential website and see how it goes from there.  I also believe that they should be the first to give up any private medical healthcare plans that they have and  be the first to experience the care provided by HMOs and clinics then come back after a long term study with their results.  Their visits should be recorded on video for  public  review so Americans can make informed decisions.

 

     Furthermore, it's my opinion that  the government allowed Dr. Kervokian to commit assisted suicides in violation of the law so they could condition the minds of the American people with the intent of introducing euthanasia knowing the population was aging.  So, did the government think that this would be the tool that would allow them to make it leal to snuff out the elderly or terminally ill or Americans who are comatose? Is this their way of determining who shall be snuffed out legally or denied pain killers so the alleged corporate HMOs/government can save money even though they will be collecting excessive taxes and estates from those who are eliminated legally?  And, will  doctors be ordered by government to introduce assisted suicide as an option for those who will be in pain if they're denied Rx pain killers?  Of course, they'll want to die.   President Obama, as senator,  proposed his Executive Order, The Global Poverty Act, introduced in 2007 and supported by V.P. Biden that would require American taxpayers to pay for the slaughter of millions of  unborn babies by abortion on demand.  Every American should look at a newborn baby and imagine the  doctor stabbing the baby in the head and  sucking its brains out of its head and crushing the head even though it is a living breathing human being?  If a fetus isn't alive then it doesn't need to be killed!  In fact, a controversial murdered abortionist said that he  held memorial in the quiet room and even cleaned up the dead babies, wrapped the babies in a blanket, and handed them to the mothers.  He said they provided photos so the mothers could have long time memories of their dead babies after the grieving process.  Why is there a grieving process since abortionists and the courts say it isn't a baby that is being killed and tortured by abortion?  So, if this abortionists didn't believe that the unborn babies weren't living beings then why did he have memorial services and provide a name for the babies or take photos of the dead babies with their mothers for their photo albums?  Well, President Obama's plan to kill babies by worldwide abortions definitely is expensive for American taxpayers and it  definitely reduces the population.

 

          And to top it all off, we watched a ex-husband who was married to another woman and divorced.  How could an ex-husband have control over an ex-wife's life if they're legally divorced?  The judge gave the ex-hsuband control over the life of  his comatose ex-wife who was alive and breathing but needed a feeding tube.  How many ex-wives would want their ex-husbands to take control of their lives after divorce?  And, yet, the courts send alleged abusers to jail without a trial based on an allegation?  Isn't pulling the feeding tube on your ex-wife and starving her to death abusive?  Or, how about denying the ex-wife's parents who love her the right to be at her bedside or care for her and keep her alive?  America's public servants have lost their way.  What if that were your child or loved one or you?  It is different if a person is on life support and can't breathe on their own, but we're now giving ex-husband's the right to determine if ex-wives  live or die and snuff them out even though they can breathe on our own?  So, where does this start and end and who gave judges the right to make ex-husband's the right to play god?  We go to jail for starving a dog, but we can starve a living breathing human being to death now in America? This causes one to wonder what happened to protecting the lives of our citizens or what happened to the value of life in America.

 

     And, socialized medicine will eliminate small businesses who will be punished and excessively taxed if they don't provide healthcare for legals and illegals.  Americans will pay for millions of foreign immigrants who have contributed nothing to our country who the government allows to enter every day.  Small businesses will be fined if they don't provide healthcare and will be excessively taxed by Obama's socialized healthcare plan.  The only citizens who will make a profit from socialized medicine are corporate America, HMOs, government, and the pharmaceutical companies and Wall Street.  Could this be part of the plan to reduce the population around the world so the "chosen" ones can live in the lifestyle they believe they deserve.  The American people are subtly being enslaved by their own government if they  pass socialized healthcare and destroy the right of Americans to choose their own healthcare programs and doctors.

 

     Wake up, America and save your freedoms and your country.  Start writing letters and calling your U.S. Congressmen and U.S. Senators and inform them that if they are in support of socialized healthcare which has been a failure in every other country then they will be voted out of office and exposed for their decisions.  Take a stand for your children and grandchildren.  Fight back for those of us whose family members fought t in wars and died in wars and are fighting today.  Do not let one man who is on a mission to "change" America's freedom; the U.S. Constitution; the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance: traditions, foundation, Judeo-Christian roots, Bill of Rights, free enterprise, and capitalism into a Third World country where the government is their God and those who oppose anything they say are taken to a secret court and found guilty and walked into the "death mobile" and snuffed out.  Or people who say anything about their government and sentenced to hard labor slave camps such as the two young U.S. journalists who were innocent but now enslaved by North Korea.   Stand up for your country and for your freedoms before it's too late! 

 

      

     This is outrageous!  President Obama to my knowledge did not disclose that he signed an Executive Order passed as  H.R. 1388 that requires U.S. taxpayers to spend $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and 'conflict victims' in Gaza according to several news reports and internet blogs.  H.R. 1388 was passed on or about May 12, 2009 without the media or our U.S. representatives informing the American people or asking for their approval.  It appears that Obama and the U.S. Congress think that they have a blank check book and that the stimulus money and all other newly printed tax dollars belongs to them and that We The People aka the taxpayers who pay their wages and beneifts  have nothing to say about who or what they write the checks for when spending our tax dollars.  Is there anything in the law that addresses the abuse of Executive Orders?  After all, a U.S. President can abuse the power of the pen by signing his own agendas under the guise of an Executive Order which then becomes a dictatorship in my opinion.

     One article states that the 'presidential determination" will permit hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to migrate to the United States and other countries which Obama signed on January 27, 2009 and can be googled in the Federal Register dated February 4, 2009 .  Obviously, Obama signed this Executive Order (H.R. 1388) seven days after he was elected.  So, it would be fair to say that he knew that he would sign this Executive Order 1388, but to my knowledge, he failed to inform the American people during his campaign of his intent which should be considered non-disclosure of a serious matter that is of public concern.

     Obama also proposed and implemented the Global Poverty Act on or about December 2007 and Biden supported Obama's bill.  A few days later, Obama applied for the Office of U.S. President and Biden was picked as V.P. Obama signed the Global Poverty Act into law by Executive Order after he was elected but to my knowledge, he never disclosed the Global Poverty Act to We The People prior to his election.  Obama's Executive Order requires the U.S. taxpayers to pay for worldwide abortions at a cost of  $460,000,000 per year.

     Obama has tripled the national debt into the trillions according to news reports and that debt can never be paid back for generations to come meaning our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren will be excessively taxed for our sins and negligence. Ironically, Obama blames George W. Bush for the national debt that he left behind even though Obama has managed to triple the national debt in about 100 days after taking office.  Obama's Executive Orders are creating excessive tax burders upon the American people at a time when the unemployment lines are reaching an all time high and people are losing their homes.  Food banks are closing as well are a myraid of businesses, banks, car dealerships, and malls.

     Obama's Executive Order H.R. 1388 provides the Palestinian refugees with ties to Hamas carte blanc when they arrive in the U.S. Obama provides the refugees with food and housing for "individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006."  Why not just invite the entire Middle East to live here?

     The American people should be outraged that hundreds of thousands of refugees with Hamas ties are being funded with our tax dollars. Obama promised to help Americans create jobs; save jobs, and stimulate the economy, but how many American citizens have received one dime of the trillions - trillions - trillions - of tax dollars that Obama insisted he needed to save Americans by chanting over and over again that the sky was falling?  Instead, he's ordered U.S. taxpayers to spend $20.3 million so that hundreds of thousands of foreign refugees can migrate into America during an economic crisis.  Now, why would he do that?  Obama ordered U.S. taxpayer to pick up the tab for the slaughter of millions of unborn (and some times born) babies by abortion worldwide without the approval of the American taxpayers during an economic crisis.  He's given millions of U.S. tax dollars to ACORN who is under investigation for voter fraud as well as millions of dollars to Planned Parenthood and the gay rights movement.  Now, I ask each American citizen whose jobs are hanging on by a thread:  "Which of the above programs that Obama has implemented within the last 100 days has or will stimulate the economy?  Which of his above programs has created jobs?  Which one of his programs has helped Americans stay in their homes?  And, which of his programs has helped small businesses expand?  

     America had better wake up and start writing and calling and emailing President Obama and their representatives requesting that he rescind his Executive Order passed as H.R. 1388 and demand that they do not use the $20.3 million to help refugees tied to Hamas to migrate into the U.S., but use the tax dollars that belong to the American people to create jobs.  Wake up, America before you no longer recognize America because you were passive and didn't read, investigate, and research what President Obama is signing into law at the expense of the American taxpayers.   

    On April 22, 2009, the congressional representatives are scheduled to vote on H.R. 1913 The Hate Crimes Act of 2009 which will be a tool for President Obama and his political supporters, as not all gays support H.R. 1913, to impose a potentially dangerous law upon the majority of American citizens who are not gay by empowering the only the gays who will have the right to allege that they are personally offended by an individual/s words or acts that they can accuse them of a hate. crime.  Hate Crimes come with very stiff punishment and devastate the lives of people who are accused even if they are innocent.   H.R. 1913 is a bias and discriminatory and dangerous law because it violates the supreme laws of the land that provide freedom of speech; freedom of thought and expression; freedom of press and freedom to protest peacefully in a free country, but this law would render the  U.S. Constitution worthless as originally written and intended and undermine equal protection under the law for all U.S. citizens in my opinion.  H.R. 1913 is introduced as a law that is providing special protection for a group who claim discrimination, but all minority groups are discriminated against of they wouldn't be called minorities, so why the favoritism for only their group which excludes all other minority groups?  H.R. 1913 is a means to by-pass the laws that allow freedom of speech  guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution under the guise of special protection but not for all minority groups, only the gays which violates the constitutional law that guarantees equal protection for all U.S. citizens of one nation.  For example, other minority groups have suffered longer and much more discrimination and pain and suffering in American than this small minority group of gays who they are excluding such as the African Americans; Hispanics; Asians, Indianans, Middle Eastern people; heterosexuals, Christians, pastors, Priests, reverends, rabbis; Jews, Catholics, Mormons, women, children, mentally challenged; conservatives, and  Republicans.  The president of Homeland Security stated in a her analysis that most of the minority groups I've just mentioned are rightwing extremists because they oppose abortion, gun control, illegal immigration and exercise freedom of speech on conspiracy theories and end time prophecies.  But, she doesn't address leftwing extremism nor their speaking out against the minority groups who are under their radar.  

 

H.R. 1913 will be the catalyst that allows one minority group who have voted in like minded elected officials with a strong agenda to discriminate against all other minority groups and individuals who oppose their policies by empowering them to accuse anyone of a hate crime based on what they say or do or write, but this bias law excludes anything the gays say, do or write.  Now, how is that a compassionate law or fair for the American people who are guaranteed equal protection for all citizens and minority groups? 

 

If  your elected representative votes for H.R. 1913 then you should consider voting him out of office and demand an amendment to H.R. 13 that would provide the same special protection for all individuals and minority groups that would be granted to the gay minority group so that all American citizens are protected equally.  Hitler silenced a nation in Europe and we all know what happened when anyone opposed him by speaking out or protesting his beliefs.  If H.R. 1913 passed then the words spoken by President Obama would ring out loud and clear when he stated that the U.S. Constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws.  Oppose H.R. 1913 and call your congress person today as this bias and discriminatory law is one giant step down a slippery slope into the valley of darkness.  

     The laws of the United States of America are simple and precise as written in the Constitution of the United States of America.  Unfortunately, Congress is turning their back on the law even though they are suppose to uphold the laws of the land and they aren't demanding that Obama produce a authentic certified United States Birth certificate which is required by law.  So, at this point, all of the politicians are violating the laws of the land.  Politicans are mostly lawyers including Obama, but they don't seem to know the laws of the land nor are they familiar with the original Constitution of the United States, obviously, or Congress would have filed a complaint and investigated this matter as soon as the country learned that Obama has a Indonesian birth certificate, but so far has failed to produce a birth certificate from Hawaii.  So, if  Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, but was born in Indonesia, then he's lied to the American people and if he does have one then he needs to produce it before election.  Are we suppose to take him at his word and if that's the case then let the illegals run for office, too, since they'll be handed out illegal drivers licenses by Obama if he's elected without proof of citizenship.

 

      CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, ARTICLE II;  "NO PERSON ACCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OR A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT NEITHER SHALL ANY PERSON BE ELIGIBLE TO THAT OFFICE WHO SHALL NOT HAVE ATTAINED THE AGE OF 35 YEARS AND HAVE FOURTEEN YEARS A RESIDENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES."