On April 22, 2009, the congressional representatives are scheduled to vote on H.R. 1913 The Hate Crimes Act of 2009 which will be a tool for President Obama and his political supporters, as not all gays support H.R. 1913, to impose a potentially dangerous law upon the majority of American citizens who are not gay by empowering the only the gays who will have the right to allege that they are personally offended by an individual/s words or acts that they can accuse them of a hate. crime.  Hate Crimes come with very stiff punishment and devastate the lives of people who are accused even if they are innocent.   H.R. 1913 is a bias and discriminatory and dangerous law because it violates the supreme laws of the land that provide freedom of speech; freedom of thought and expression; freedom of press and freedom to protest peacefully in a free country, but this law would render the  U.S. Constitution worthless as originally written and intended and undermine equal protection under the law for all U.S. citizens in my opinion.  H.R. 1913 is introduced as a law that is providing special protection for a group who claim discrimination, but all minority groups are discriminated against of they wouldn't be called minorities, so why the favoritism for only their group which excludes all other minority groups?  H.R. 1913 is a means to by-pass the laws that allow freedom of speech  guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution under the guise of special protection but not for all minority groups, only the gays which violates the constitutional law that guarantees equal protection for all U.S. citizens of one nation.  For example, other minority groups have suffered longer and much more discrimination and pain and suffering in American than this small minority group of gays who they are excluding such as the African Americans; Hispanics; Asians, Indianans, Middle Eastern people; heterosexuals, Christians, pastors, Priests, reverends, rabbis; Jews, Catholics, Mormons, women, children, mentally challenged; conservatives, and  Republicans.  The president of Homeland Security stated in a her analysis that most of the minority groups I've just mentioned are rightwing extremists because they oppose abortion, gun control, illegal immigration and exercise freedom of speech on conspiracy theories and end time prophecies.  But, she doesn't address leftwing extremism nor their speaking out against the minority groups who are under their radar.  

 

H.R. 1913 will be the catalyst that allows one minority group who have voted in like minded elected officials with a strong agenda to discriminate against all other minority groups and individuals who oppose their policies by empowering them to accuse anyone of a hate crime based on what they say or do or write, but this bias law excludes anything the gays say, do or write.  Now, how is that a compassionate law or fair for the American people who are guaranteed equal protection for all citizens and minority groups? 

 

If  your elected representative votes for H.R. 1913 then you should consider voting him out of office and demand an amendment to H.R. 13 that would provide the same special protection for all individuals and minority groups that would be granted to the gay minority group so that all American citizens are protected equally.  Hitler silenced a nation in Europe and we all know what happened when anyone opposed him by speaking out or protesting his beliefs.  If H.R. 1913 passed then the words spoken by President Obama would ring out loud and clear when he stated that the U.S. Constitution is no more than a charter of negative laws.  Oppose H.R. 1913 and call your congress person today as this bias and discriminatory law is one giant step down a slippery slope into the valley of darkness.  

     I've listened to the media talk show hosts and guests as well as some talk show hosts state that it's ridiculous for the American people to demand that Barack Hussein Obama produce a valid birth certificate because it would cause the entire country to go "bonkers."  The country is not going to go "bonkers" over Obama's birth certificate if it proves to be true or false any more than they went "bonkers" over the Attorney General investigating  the Clinton's and calling for impeachment or the investigation and impeachment of President Nixon.  The American people want to know the truth and they deserve to know the truth.  In fact, they pay the wages of the U.S. Justices with their hard earned taxdollars whose jobs were created because of the establishment of the U.S. Constitution and it is their duty to ensure that the U.S. Constitution is upheld no matter what the consequences.  If we allow the U.S. President's or other people who hold themselves above the law to ignore the laws of the land and snub their noses at our laws then what's the point of having any laws because that would mean that the laws are enforced for some but not for all.

      There are serious reasons that these lawsuits should be granted which most people don't think about.  First, the U.S. Constitution was established to protect the welfare and safety of the people as well as protect our national security from being compromised by a foreign spy or illegal alien.  The fact that we are told that we must accept Obama and Michelle's statements or the media's statements that he's a U.S. natural born citizen is ridiculous.  If it was that simple then why didn't he just produce it to the court or to the Justice Department or the U.S. Senate so that they can confirm with certainty to the people of the United States that he is a U.S. natural born citizen. In fact, just today, I heard an radio ad that was recruiting people for the CIA and in their message they stated that if any citizen wants to apply for a job that they must produce "proof of citizenship."  So, if the averal citizen must produce a birth certificate to work in government then why doesn't an elected U.S. President have to follow the laws of the land and produce a birth certificate?

     Furthermore, the fact that the government and U.S. Justices may not hear the lawsuits filed requesting the production of Obama's birth certificate would set a precedent in the United States.  This would mean that anyone, legal or illegal, could run for U.S. President and not have to produce a valid U.S. proof of citizenship.  Also, we don't know if the president-elect Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen, or a legal citizen after returning to live in the United States from Indonesia or an illegal alien.  I've never heard Obama say that he's a natural born U.S. citizen, but I've heard his wife state that he was born in Hawaii in the news.  If Obama were not a natural born U.S. citizen as required by Article II, U.S. Constitution, then he would have to step down.  But, if this situation were to occur then there could be a problem of alleged perjury and alleged fraud upon Hillary Clinton and the DNC and the American people, so it seems to me that it would be in Obama's best interest to put this issue to rest and produce his U.S. birth certificate that for whatever reason has been sealed. 

     The fact that McCain wasn't born in the U.S. is a totally different situation because both his parents were U.S. citizens and his dad was in the U.S. military which has nothing similar to the case involving Obama's birth.  It is frightening to think that anyone can run for U.S. President without any credentials and with the majority of people knowing very little about that person's background other than some of his neighbors and associates are anti-American pastors, professors, former terrorists, and pro-abortionists who continuuously talks about change and inferring socialists ideologies, yet won't produce his Thesis from Harvard, either.

     The question remains then why should the American people have to produce their birth certificates to get jobs and to enter or leave the country and for any other reason if the law isn't upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.  It's dangerous when the U.S. Justices and the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Congress ignore or violate the laws of the land because that means that they don't respect the laws of the land and hold themselves above the laws of the land.  For example, the greatest fraud upon the American people was the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac high jacking of taxpayers money because they participated in the act of fraudulent loans and weren't held accountable because they held themselves above the law and that's why it's so dangerous to allow any government agency paid by our tax dollars hold themselves above the U.S. Constitutional laws of the land.

     Also, attorney Berg states that the birth certificate on the internet is a fraud and a forgery.  He says that Obama's grandmother and brother and stepsister said he's born in Kenya.  It's also reported that his stepdad moved Obama and his mom to Indonesia and by their law, you must denounce American citizenship and be a Indonesian citizen in order to attend their Islamic teaching schools.

The questions remains if he or his mother filed the proper immigration papers upon his return to the U.S., but even if he did and he wasn't born in Hawaii, he wouldn't be eligible to be the U.S. President.  It's important for the American people to know who is in the oval office and if he is a man of integrity and character or if he's committed a fraud on America which can be easily proven by the production of a simple birth certificate.  Good grief, you have to be fingerprinted just to get into Sea World!